Mellel impresses with its range of style-oriented features, although it loses ground due to limited layout options. The latter offers similar features to Pages, but creating and editing styles via its sidebar feels far more intuitive. With Pages, the ability to easily select all instances of a style is a nice touch, although it pales beside the supreme elegance of Nisus Writer Pro. The current version is no exception, and its superior interface nudges it ahead of Word.īoth apps are fine at styles, too, although Word's interface is often needlessly complex and fiddly. Word has improved since Office 2004, and now provides more scope for precision layout and effects, but this was always Pages' virtue, straddling the divide between word processing and DTP. In terms of layout, Word and Pages get a kick-start via their selection of good-looking built-in templates. This category encompasses each application's ability to create styles for ensuring document-wide visual consistency, along with the kind of DTP-style layout capabilities that many users of word processors require these days. Scrivener presents a different way of working, based around projects, but its fantastic tutorial and tidy interface means it scores highly. By comparison, is aping an aged Word, and Word itself, despite some interface refinements, feels cluttered and overbearing. Nisus also adds various widgets that enhance usability and nudge it ahead of Pages.
What is the word processing for mac how to#
It's just far more obvious how to use them. Even with its exhaustive documentation, we often became disorientated, and the application's inability to undo past save points proved a big drawback.Īmong Word,, Pages and Nisus Writer Pro, the streamlined offerings from Apple and Nisus win out. Mellel's bizarre interface left us nonplussed, and it's easy to get lost in its maze of options.
0 kommentar(er)
